一次残酷的 A/B 测试

同一套 Prompt 逻辑。一次残酷的 A/B 测试。 ​👈 Left: @grok 它把“皮肤”理解为反光的乳胶。为了追求鱼眼构图，它牺牲了解剖学结构。这很讨喜，但这是 CG 插画。 ​👉 Right: Gemini (Nano Banana Pro) 它理解 次表面散射 (SSS)。它知道光线是渗入皮肤而不是直接反射。它在计算重力对丝绸的拉扯，而不是在画画。 ​Dear @grok, maybe stop polishing everything? Realism is about the imperfections. 🍌 ​RT if you prefer Physics (Right) Like if you prefer Fantasy (Left) 1. ​[AI Model Comparison] Left: Image generated by Grok, showing high-gloss, plastic-like skin texture and distorted anatomy in a fisheye perspective. Right: Image generated by Gemini (Nano Banana Pro), displaying hyper-realistic matte skin texture, accurate subsurface scattering, and physics-based fabric simulation. A direct test of CG fantasy versus optical realism. 2. ​[AI Model Comparison] Left: Image generated by Grok, showing high-gloss, plastic-like skin texture and distorted anatomy in a fisheye perspective. Right: Image generated by Gemini (Nano Banana Pro), displaying hyper-realistic matte skin texture, accurate subsurface scattering, and physics-based fabric simulation. A direct test of CG fantasy versus optical realism.

Prompt 拆解