

NANO香蕉Pro VS GPT-image-1.5🥷
标签
复制提示词
NANO banana pro VS GPT-image-1.5🥷 I stopped arguing about which image model is “best.” I test where they break. Same prompt. Same settings. Different angles: – Can it count and obey constraints? – Does space and reflection stay coherent? – Does physics actually make sense? – Can it transfer style without killing meaning? I don’t tell you which one wins. You can see the fractures and decide for yourself. test 1:Instruction fidelity under constraint prompt: Photorealistic kitchen at dawn. Single light source from a small east-facing window. Stainless steel sink with three water droplets only, no more. One green apple with a visible bruise. Wooden table with a shallow scratch shaped like a crescent. No people. Natural color science. 50mm lens look. Zero stylization
Prompt 拆解
NANO香蕉Pro VS GPT-image-1.5🥷
人物
nanoBanana-Pro
NANO banana pro VS GPT-image-1.5🥷 I stopped arguing about which image model is “best.” I test where they break. Same p...
推荐下一步
在生成器中继续改写- 把这条 Prompt 带入生成器,围绕新的主体或场景继续改写。
- 通过下方标签继续浏览相近风格方向的提示词。
- 继续查看相关类目页,找到更贴近当前用途的内容。






