PROMPT.STUDIO
返回广场
NANO香蕉Pro VS GPT-image-1.5🥷,人物,nanoBanana-Pro,人物, 现实风格参考图,第 1 张,共 2 张
NANO香蕉Pro VS GPT-image-1.5🥷,人物,nanoBanana-Pro,人物, 现实风格参考图,第 2 张,共 2 张

NANO香蕉Pro VS GPT-image-1.5🥷

作者: AI Systems & Power模型: nanoBanana-Pro发布时间: 2025/12/17 07:55:41

复制提示词

NANO banana pro VS GPT-image-1.5🥷 I stopped arguing about which image model is “best.” I test where they break. Same prompt. Same settings. Different angles: – Can it count and obey constraints? – Does space and reflection stay coherent? – Does physics actually make sense? – Can it transfer style without killing meaning? I don’t tell you which one wins. You can see the fractures and decide for yourself. test 1:Instruction fidelity under constraint prompt: Photorealistic kitchen at dawn. Single light source from a small east-facing window. Stainless steel sink with three water droplets only, no more. One green apple with a visible bruise. Wooden table with a shallow scratch shaped like a crescent. No people. Natural color science. 50mm lens look. Zero stylization

Prompt 拆解

主体

NANO香蕉Pro VS GPT-image-1.5🥷

场景

人物

风格与光线

nanoBanana-Pro

保留细节

NANO banana pro VS GPT-image-1.5🥷 I stopped arguing about which image model is “best.” I test where they break. Same p...

  • 把这条 Prompt 带入生成器,围绕新的主体或场景继续改写。
  • 通过下方标签继续浏览相近风格方向的提示词。
  • 继续查看相关类目页,找到更贴近当前用途的内容。
查看 X 原帖